In Situ Decommissioning of the Whiteshell Reactor #1

Comment Search Mobile

Comment Search

Skip to filters

84 results

Attachment From Brokenhead Ojibway Nation, Hollow Water First Nation, and Black River First Nation to The Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission re: Comments on the Environmental Impact Statement for the In Situ Decommissioning of the Whiteshell Reactor #1

  • In Situ Decommissioning of the Whiteshell Reactor #1
  • Author: Administration
  • Reference Number: 56
  • Submitted: 2018-01-23
  • Project Phase: N/A
  • Participation Notice: N/A
  • From Brokenhead Ojibway Nation, Hollow Water First Nation, and Black River First Nation to The Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission re: Comments on the Environmental Impact Statement for the In Situ Decommissioning of the Whiteshell Reactor #1
  • Attachment Included
  • Date: Meeting from February, 2017 From: Patricia Mitchell (Brokenhead Ojibway Nation, Hollow Water First Nation, and Black River First Nation To: Candida Cianci, Environmental Assessment Specialist Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission By email: cnsc.ea-ee.ccsn@canada.ca Subject line: Black River, Brokenhead, Hollow Water - Commentary / Nuclear Decommissioning project CEAA Reference number: 80124 Comments: As per our conversation on Friday att'd is a summary of comments heard during the two-day gathering held in Brokenhead in February 2017. Let me know if you have any questions or if additional information is required. Thank you. Patricia Mitchell Lands & Special Projects Manager Black River First Nation Black River First Nation – Nuclear Decommissioning Project The following is a brief summary of comments made during the two-day meeting held in Brokenhead Ojibway Nation in February 2017. Members from Brokenhead Ojibway Nation, ...

Attachment From Sagkeeng First Nation to The Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission re: Comments on the Environmental Impact Statement for the In Situ Decommissioning of the Whiteshell Reactor #1

  • In Situ Decommissioning of the Whiteshell Reactor #1
  • Author: Administration
  • Reference Number: 55
  • Submitted: 2018-01-15
  • Project Phase: N/A
  • Participation Notice: N/A
  • From Sagkeeng First Nation to The Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission re: Comments on the Environmental Impact Statement for the In Situ Decommissioning of the Whiteshell Reactor #1
  • Attachment Included
  • Date: January 15th, 2018 From: Sagkeeng First Nation To: Candida Cianci, Environmental Assessment Specialist Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission By email: cnsc.ea-ee.ccsn@canada.ca Subject line: Sagkeeng Technical Submissions on CNL Whiteshell Lab EIS CEAA Reference number: 80124 Comments: Candida, Pursuant to the extension granted to Sagkeeng by Clare Cattrysse, attached is a cover letter and associated documents for submission as Sagkeeng First Nation’s comments on the technical review of CNL’s EIS for its Whiteshell Laboratory in situ decommissioning plan. Sagkeeng’s technical review was comprehensive, and recommends specific changes and additional material that is required from CNL. CNSC should adopt Sagkeeng’s recommendations without exception. Please confirm receipt and acceptance of the attached documents. We look forward to discussing this, and more, with CNSC on February 2nd. Yours Truly, Corey Shefman 2 5 0 U N I V E R S I T Y ...

Attachment Supplementary Submission From Gordon Edwards and the Canadian Coalition for Nuclear Responsibility to The Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission re: Comments on the Environmental Impact Statement for the In Situ Decommissioning of the Whiteshell Reactor #1

  • In Situ Decommissioning of the Whiteshell Reactor #1
  • Author: Administration
  • Reference Number: 54
  • Submitted: 2018-01-15
  • Project Phase: N/A
  • Participation Notice: N/A
  • Supplementary Submission From Gordon Edwards and the Canadian Coalition for Nuclear Responsibility to The Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission re: Comments on the Environmental Impact Statement for the In Situ Decommissioning of the Whiteshell Reactor #1
  • Attachment Included
  • Date: January 15th, 2018 From: Gordon Edwards To: Candida Cianci, Environmental Assessment Specialist Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission By email: cnsc.ea-ee.ccsn@canada.ca Subject line: Supplementary Comments on Draft Environmental Impact Statement: In Situ Decommissioning of the WR-1 CEAA Reference number: 80124 Comments: Dear Ms. Cianci Here is the supplementary submission on the draft EIS for the WR-1 Reactor In-situ Decommissioning Project. Thank you, Gordon Edwards, PhD, President, Canadian Coalition for Nuclear Responsibility Canadian Coalition for Nuclear Responsibility www.ccnr.org (514) 489 5118 ccnr@web.ca Supplementary Comments on Draft Environmental Impact Statement: In Situ Decommissioning of the WR-1 Reactor (CEA Registry Number 80124) To: Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) From: Canadian Coalition for Nuclear Responsibility (CCNR) Date: January 15, 2018 Part 1. As stated on page 1-7 of the ...

Attachment Consolidated Table of Federal and Provincial Comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the In Situ Decommissioning of the Whiteshell Reactor #1 Tableau des commentaires fédéraux et provinciaux consolidés sur l'ébauche d'Étude d'impact environnemental pour le Déclassement in situ du réacteur Whiteshell-1 (Note: le tableau est disponible en français sur demande)

  • In Situ Decommissioning of the Whiteshell Reactor #1
  • Author: Administration
  • Reference Number: 51
  • Submitted: 2017-12-22
  • Project Phase: N/A
  • Participation Notice: N/A
  • Consolidated Table of Federal and Provincial Comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the In Situ Decommissioning of the Whiteshell Reactor #1
  • Attachment Included
  • e-Doc: 5331354 Page 1 WR-1 Draft EIS and Supporting Documentation – Federal and Provincial Technical Review Comment Table December 22, 2017 No. Department/ Agency Section, Table or Figure Pg. # Information Request or Summary of Comment Response (to be completed by CNL) EIS General 1. Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) All - General N/A Comment: The terminology in the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) documentation to identify Indigenous peoples is not, in all cases, appropriately used. The use of the term “First Nations” is not interchangeable with the term “Indigenous peoples”. When referring to both First Nation and Métis communities either indicate this explicitly or indicate “Indigenous communities”. Expectation to Address Comment: Please review and revise the EIS documentation accordingly with the use of the appropriate terms. 2. CNSC All - General N/A Comment: References in the EIS to the Métis [note: ...
  • Attachment Included
  • e-Doc: 5331354 Page 1 WR-1 Draft EIS and Supporting Documentation – Federal and Provincial Technical Review Comment Table December 22, 2017 No. Department/ Agency Section, Table or Figure Pg. # Information Request or Summary of Comment Response (to be completed by CNL) EIS General 1. Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) All - General N/A Comment: The terminology in the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) documentation to identify Indigenous peoples is not, in all cases, appropriately used. The use of the term “First Nations” is not interchangeable with the term “Indigenous peoples”. When referring to both First Nation and Métis communities either indicate this explicitly or indicate “Indigenous communities”. Expectation to Address Comment: Please review and revise the EIS documentation accordingly with the use of the appropriate terms. 2. CNSC All - General N/A Comment: References in the EIS to the Métis [note: ...

Attachment From Gordon Edwards to The Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission re: Comments on the Environmental Impact Statement for the In Situ Decommissioning of the Whiteshell Reactor #1

  • In Situ Decommissioning of the Whiteshell Reactor #1
  • Author: Administration
  • Reference Number: 47
  • Submitted: 2017-12-19
  • Project Phase: N/A
  • Participation Notice: N/A
  • From Gordon Edwards to The Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission re: Comments on the Environmental Impact Statement for the In Situ Decommissioning of the Whiteshell Reactor #1
  • Attachment Included
  • Date: December 20th 2017 From: Gordon Edwards To: Candida Cianci, Environmental Assessment Specialist Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission By email: cnsc.ea-ee.ccsn@canada.ca Subject line: Comments on Draft Environmental Impact Statement: In Situ Decommissioning of the WR- 1 Reactor (CEA Registry Number 80124) CEAA Reference number: 80124 Comments: Dear Ms. Cianci The Canadian Coalition for Nuclear Responsibility (CCNR) intends to submit comments on the proposed in-situ decommissioning of the WR-1 reactor, but illness and exhaustion has made it impossible to meet the deadline. Will it be possible to provide a supplementary submission elaborating on the following points? 1. The proposed in-situ decommissioning of the WR-1 reactor is radically different from previous plans to remove all radioactive materials from the site and return the site to “green field” status. The proposal is now in effect a proposal to create a permanent repository for ...

Attachment From the Canadian Environmental Law Association to The Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission re: Comments on the Environmental Impact Statement for the In Situ Decommissioning of the Whiteshell Reactor #1

  • In Situ Decommissioning of the Whiteshell Reactor #1
  • Author: Administration
  • Reference Number: 39
  • Submitted: 2017-12-19
  • Project Phase: N/A
  • Participation Notice: N/A
  • From the Canadian Environmental Law Association to The Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission re: Comments on the Environmental Impact Statement for the In Situ Decommissioning of the Whiteshell Reactor #1
  • Attachment Included
  • Date: December 19th 2017 From: Kerrie Blaise (Canadian Environmental Law Association) To: Candida Cianci, Environmental Assessment Specialist Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission By email: cnsc.ea-ee.ccsn@canada.ca Subject line: CELA Submission - In Situ Decommissioning of the Whiteshell Reactor (Ref No. 80124) CEAA Reference number: 80124 Comments: Dear Ms. Cianci, In response to the CNSC's invite for comments (dated October 5, 2017), please find attached the Canadian Environmental Law Association's submission regarding the draft environmental impact statement for the in-situ decommissioning of the Whiteshell reactor, located in Manitoba. Please let me know if there are any questions. Thank you for this comment opportunity. Regards, Kerrie -- Kerrie Blaise, Counsel Canadian Environmental Law Association Canadian Environmental Law Association T 416 960-2284 • F 416 960-9392 • 55 University Ave, Suite 1500 Toronto, Ontario, M5J 2H7 • ...

Attachment From W. Turner (supplementary submission) to The Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission re: Comments on the Environmental Impact Statement for the In Situ Decommissioning of the Whiteshell Reactor #1

  • In Situ Decommissioning of the Whiteshell Reactor #1
  • Author: Administration
  • Reference Number: 48
  • Submitted: 2017-12-18
  • Project Phase: N/A
  • Participation Notice: N/A
  • From W. Turner (supplementary submission) to The Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission re: Comments on the Environmental Impact Statement for the In Situ Decommissioning of the Whiteshell Reactor #1
  • Attachment Included
  • Date: December 18, 2017 From: W. Turner To: Candida Cianci, Environmental Assessment Specialist Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission By email: cnsc.ea-ee.ccsn@canada.ca Subject line: Supplementary submission w.r.t. the Draft EIS report for the WR-1 ISD project CEAA Reference number: 80124 Comments: Dear Ms. Cianci: I have come to the end of reviewing Revision 1 of the draft EIS for the “In Situ Decommissioning of the WR-1 Reactor at the Whiteshell Laboratories Site” (Registry Number 80124). I had hoped that the CNSC would have directed CNL to withdraw this document since it did not address both the CNSC’s dispositions on the Project Description and CNSC Regulatory Policy P-290. I have therefore taken the time to review this report. However, after spending sometime evaluating the report, I came to the conclusion that the report is even more flawed than suggested by the two issues I identified in my previous submission. Attached are my comments. ...

Date Submitted Display Filters

Filters

Date modified: